OFFICIAL VOICE OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY OF CUBA CENTRAL COMMITTEE
Photo: Illustration by Michel Moro

The Allegory of the Cave is a metaphorical explanation written by the Greek philosopher Plato in Book VII of The Republic. He uses it to explain how human knowledge and education work, and the complex relationship between the sensible world (what we perceive) and the intelligible world (truth).
In our current times, the convergence of artificial intelligence, big data, and neuroscience has taken media manipulation to an unprecedented level of development. The old paradigm of persuasion based on rational arguments is dead.
It's no longer about sending the same message to a demographic group, but about tailoring each stimulus to the individual's mood through adaptive micro-segmentation and the mass production of hypersensory messages.
They use what's known as "sentiment-based content optimization"; algorithms analyze our interactions on social networks in real time to modify the ads we see. They create a kind of "personalized echo chamber" in which the individual only receives information that reinforces their pre-existing biases.
With the rapid development of social media platforms, user-generated content—in which people share their daily lives, opinions, and emotions—provides a wealth of information. Thus, the application of sentiment analysis techniques to social media data has become a widely used tool for studying public opinion.
Platforms like TikTok use what's known as "viral emotion engineering," in which the algorithm rewards raw emotion over reflection. This technique is no longer just about disinformation, but about organizing simplistic narratives based, for example, on elements like "betrayal" or "all is lost," which generate shock and are easily replicated.
They exploit effects like the "cocktail"—that is, speaking directly to the recipient's personal experience—or "loss aversion," which is nothing more than presenting any change as a catastrophic loss, to mobilize fear in favor of the manipulators.
Recent research published in Science warns of the danger of "AI swarms." To better understand the risk, these are systems that deploy thousands of fake profiles that don't simply repeat a slogan, but interact, adapt, and evolve to create the illusion of a majority social consensus around an idea.
It becomes clear, then, that "synthetic consensus" is far more dangerous than a single piece of fake news, or the work that bot farms could do before the development of AI.
In this way, a dual ecosystem is being consolidated, in which platforms like Telegram act as coordination centers and launchpads for false narratives, while TikTok is used to amplify their emotional reach and normalize them among the population. This "covert coordination" allows a message crafted in a small group to flood millions of screens in a matter of hours.
Undoubtedly, the greatest danger is not the lie itself, but the destruction of trust in the mechanisms that allow us to distinguish truth from falsehood. When any video can be fake and any trend can be the product of a swarm of bots, what and whom do we believe?
It may seem like science fiction, but there is already talk of "neural propaganda." What is it? George Orwell's universe would seem like child's play.
"Neural propaganda" raises the possibility of injecting messages directly into the visual cortex during sleep, using brain-computer interfaces. The results of this "technique" take manipulation to the realm of inhumanity and madness.
They want to build a world emptied of reality, in which humanity would live subjugated by an elite that controls the irrational fears of the human brain, capable of inducing anything they desire.
For us, today the cave wall is the screens of our mobile phones and televisions; the shadows are not projected by statues, but by algorithms, deepfakes, AI swarms, and neuromarketing techniques.
We are the captives in the cave when we consume content without questioning its origin, trapped in echo chambers that reinforce our ideas without showing us the external reality. This "synthetic consensus" we refer to is the modern version of the shadows: a fabricated reality that seems true because all the other prisoners (or their digital avatars) also applaud it.
The myth warns us that freeing ourselves from manipulation is a painful process, requiring effort, study, and questioning what we see. Furthermore, those who attempt it risk being ridiculed or "eliminated" by a society that may prefer the comfort of its familiar shadows to the discomfort of a complex truth.

Sources: UBC Science, LMS Political Campaign, IDW Informationsdienst Wissenschaft.